The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation:
Cease and Desist
The Foundation operates in support of Project Gutenberg. Project
Gutenberg operates in strict conformance to the copyright laws of the
United States, and is highly motivated to identify items which are
public domain in the United States for addition to the Project Gutenberg
For various reasons, persons and organizations claiming to own
copyright to some of the public domain works that Project Gutenberg
redistributes often choose to contact PGLAF. Usually, the contact
consists of variations on asserting copyright ownership over a
public domain item, and insisting that we remove it from our collection.
These pages include some of our responses to such letters, in the
hopes that they will be useful to other advocates of the public domain.
They might also be helpful to organizations considering sending such
a letter to the Foundation.
Some brief facts concerning these types of correspondence:
- Project Gutenberg operates only in the United States, and we
only post our files to servers in the United States.
- Affiliates, such as Project Gutenberg of Australia and
Project Gutenberg of the European Union, are independently operated
and have their own people, procedures and servers.
- We are unaware of any case where copyright laws of another country
impacts public domain status in the US.
- Our full copyright procedures are available here: http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:Copyright_How-To
- Our procedures for asserting public domain status on an eBook have
been extensively reviewed by lawyers with speciality in copyright
Our responses indicate the nature of the complaint, the eBook(s) or
authors involved, and our proposed resolution to the issues raised.
- Response to Bear/Anderson concerning Poul Anderson's
The Escape. After consulting with one of our copyright
determined that serial works are
a single act of authorship, even if they are published in
separate parts. As such, a copyright renewal for one portion
can be considered to apply to the whole. As a result, we removed
The Escape from our collection, and have revised our
procedures for researching non-renewal status for items published
from 1923-1963 (our "copyright rule 6").
- Response to L'Illustration, a French
site, complaining about trademark infringement. Apart from claiming a
registered tradmark which does not exist, this letter made the mistake
of thinking that words are trademarked. If a use of a trademark (word,
phrase, etc.) is not confusingly similar to the protected trademark,
then there is no infringement.
- Response to Gone with the Wind.
We received a complaint that PG must stop PG of Australia from
distributing this title, which is copyrighted in the US but public
domain in Australia. The response specifies that PGLAF/PG does not run
PG of Australia.
- Response to Anthem, by Ayn
Rand. We received a complaint that the fact of this title's copyright
protection anywhere in the world prevents PG from redistributing it in
the US, where it is public domain. The response points out there is no
basis for their claim.
- Response to Siddhartha,
by Herman Hesse. Similar to the Ayn Rand complaint for our
German version of this eBook, but also claiming that our own
translation to English, which the volunteer translators granted
to the public domain, is a copyright violation. The response rejects
- Response to Curtis Brown
Australia Ltc., claiming our titles by Mary Grant Bruce infringe
on their Australian copyright. The response points out that
the titles remain public domain in the US, and the Australian
copyright is not relevant for PG's redistribution of the work. An
interesting quote from their letter is, "Under the Free Trade
Agreement with the United States, Australia agreed to extend
the duration of copyright." This is astounding, since we at Project
Gutenberg have never met anyone anywhere who favors extension of
copyright, or who wants other countries to extend their copyright.